Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Jay Drew

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  keep. (non-admin closure) JJP...MASTER![talk to] JJP... master? 01:13, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

Draft:Jay Drew

 * – (View MfD)

Unsourced BLP, a request to add sources has been ignored. SK2242 (talk) 13:00, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete as an unsourced BLP. It also happens to be promotion and no hint of notability. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 14:26, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
 * I could find no reliable independent source. Unsourced BLPs should be deleted exactly per BLPPROD, allow seven days to find a reliable source. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 20:55, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Weeks later, it is still an unsourced BLP. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 05:23, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep per WP:NMFD, though I have no doubt it will be G13'd. —  csc -1 16:45, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
 * WP:BLP is policy that is active in all namespaces. NMFD does not explicitly mention unsourced BLPs as something not to delete, and should not be used as a response to just any draft at MfD. SK2242 (talk) 16:53, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Draftspace exists as a place for articles to be developed, obviously any contentious material should be removed per policy, but otherwise it should just be left for WP:G13. —  csc -1 17:12, 17 February 2021 (UTC)


 * NMFD is about non-notability not being allowed to be the primary reason to delete a draft, but given another reason, it can be considered. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 20:57, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep for now, hasn't been submitted yet. Can be tagged for autobiography if it has a promotional tone. AngusW🐶🐶F  ( bark  •  sniff ) 18:07, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete - Will this person ever be notable ? Well judging by these search results the answer's no. Most Nigerian/Zambian bios created here tend to not be notable and this draft looks nothing different from the rest of the now-deleted drafts/articles. If he becomes notable in the future someone can go to REFUND or just recreate. – Davey 2010 Talk 19:26, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep - Drafts allow time to compile and add sources; if nothing comes of it, then the darkness that is G13 will snuff out its light. If it is unreasonably promotional to the point of no hope, then request it be speedied. — Godsy (TALK CONT ) 10:53, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep autobio that will be G13d in the course of time.  Java Hurricane  14:10, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep because notability does not apply to drafts, and because SmokeyJoe has a good idea about unsourced draft BLPs, but it isn't policy yet. Robert McClenon (talk) 02:55, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Weak delete, too promotional, there really is no plausible indication of notability now and no realistic chance of becoming notable any time soon, as Davey2010's search indicates. I don't see a point in retaining this draft for months "just because". Nsk92 (talk) 12:09, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.