Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Jindal Stainless

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  delete. Salvio 07:08, 14 August 2020 (UTC)

Draft:Jindal Stainless

 * – (View MfD)

Deceptive promotional article start by sockpuppet and continued by ip's. See note on article for the deception.  DGG ( talk ) 22:21, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete - The nominator didn't provide the most damning diff, which in my opinion is https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Jindal_Stainless&type=revision&diff=961814186&oldid=936105391&diffmode=source
 * The draft was Rejected, and the IP removed the rejection and resubmitted without discussion. In my opinion, anything that is resubmitted after rejection without discussion should either be deleted or result in sanctions.  We are here, and rejection should be final, and resubmitting after rejection without discussion is tendentious and disruptive.  Robert McClenon (talk) 03:41, 8 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and Robert.  Java Hurricane  04:47, 10 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per the above comments. Unsalvagable as is, even if someone wanted to write an article on this subject and had enough sources to pass WP:GNG, starting from a dishonest draft like that one is a terrible idea for many reasons. Nathan2055talk - contribs 02:15, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.