Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Joe Jackman

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  no consensus. signed,Rosguill talk 23:06, 19 February 2020 (UTC)

Draft:Joe Jackman

 * – (View MfD)
 *  N0nsensical.system (err0r?)(.log) 14:48, 10 February 2020 (UTC)

Fails GNG, previously deleted under G11 after having been created by User:JackmanReinvents (talk). Existed under multiple titles with no substantial changes to address the original deletion reason. echo off /p /t /c 01:06, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep WP:GNG does not apply to Draft: namespace. This article may well not be ready for the Main: namespace, but that's not a reason for deletion. The best way to delete drafts, save for those drafts that are excessively promotional which this is not, is to wait for six months and speedy delete per WP:CSD. I see nothing that says this draft needs to be deleted sooner as Google doesn't index the draft space. --Doug Mehus T · C  01:33, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
 * I struck the part about GNG, if that's okay. I don't think the article is going to be expanded much anytime soon. echo off /p /t /c 01:41, 2 February 2020 (UTC)


 * Neutral - This draft doesn't need deleting yet. It needs declining.  Robert McClenon (talk) 18:36, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Comment I put a COI username notice on since that's the name of his company. I only saw one duplicate draft that I will redirect to this one. Are there others? Are they being tendentiously resubmitted?  AngusWOOF  ( bark  •  sniff ) 15:03, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
 * As far as I know, Draft:Joseph Patrick Jackman is the only live duplicate; however, this page contained almost the exact same text, and it was deleted twice. Draft:Joe Jackman was created after the sandbox's deletion. After the draft was deleted, the sandbox was recreated (and then deleted again). I remember at least one draft having on it, but I don't think any were submitted before being deleted the sandbox page was declined. echo off /p /t /c 17:16, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
 * who rejected the duplicate on whether this still has potential. AngusWOOF  ( bark  •  sniff ) 17:29, 6 February 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  N0nsensical.system (err0r?)(.log) 14:48, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
 * neutral / keep, per Robert McClenon. The "noindex" robot directive works fine. - Nabla (talk) 15:07, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.