Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Johan van der Voet (2)

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 15:33, 13 March 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Johan van der Voet (2)


This is the second of three copies of a draft about Johan van der Voet, and is worse formatted than Draft:Johan van der Voet. We don't need multiple drafts on the same person. (Whether we need the first is another question.) Robert McClenon (talk) 17:38, 5 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete all three no credible claim of significance so not much hope for an article from this autobiography. I note 2 was moved from his userpage where it was a WP:FAKEARTICLE. It could even go G11. I combined the sandbox nomination with this one for ease of handling Legacypac (talk) 00:43, 6 March 2018 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.