Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Jon Dana Kendall

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was Delete. — xaosflux  Talk 17:20, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Jon Dana Kendall


Unsourced BLP draft with no claim of significance. Not worked on for over 6 months Legacypac (talk) 03:29, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. I'd possibly give it a little time if it wasn't a single unsourced sentence that looks like it's going nowhere. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 06:09, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. As Ricky81682 says, I would prefer to give it more time, but I don't really see enough potential here (especially as it's only a single sentence without sources). Chrisw80 (talk) 23:08, 22 May 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.