Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Jonathan Brossard

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: keep. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 21:17, 19 June 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Jonathan Brossard


Draft elegible for CSD G13 but maybe notable according to one reviewer and not notable according to another. Bringing it to MfD for discussion. Should it be deleted or promoted? Legacypac (talk) 08:22, 11 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep - Should not be promoted because, per reviewer comments, it is not currently suitable for mainspace. Should not be deleted because, also per reviewer comments, subject may be notable. I don't understand why action is required here. Drafts do not hang on a precipice between deletion or promotion as the nom appears to believe - there is a comfortable range of content quality for which being a draft is fine option. A2soup (talk) 07:27, 15 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Draft space is not a shadow encyclopedia of content not good enough for mainspace. Legacypac (talk) 16:12, 15 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Which is why it is not indexed. What would you say draftspace is, out of curiosity? A2soup (talk) 19:44, 16 June 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep per A2soup. Deletion or "promotion" are not the only options. — Godsy (TALK CONT ) 14:09, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.