Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:José Antonio Chic

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: no consensus. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 22:29, 17 November 2017 (UTC)

Draft:José Antonio Chic


The draft is not written with a neutral point of view and also it looks promotional. Simranpreet singh (talk) 14:04, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete– 1) the subject does not yet appear to meet the requirements for notability. He may be on the cusp, but I didn't find significant independent coverage. The one newspaper article cited is promising, but is clearly based largely on an interview. 2) as a BLP, the draft fails to have in-line referencing for its content. 3) (I've tagged the contributor's userpage for COI and implying shared use.) 4) would this content be allowed in a userspace draft? I think probably "yes", so I have not redirected User:EnsembleXXI/José Antonio Chic to this draft. I did carry over the ref that was missing from the draft. The attribution to es:wiki is in the edit history for the userspace draft; some similar attribution should appear on any article derived from this draft.  &mdash; jmcgnh  (talk) (contribs)  15:24, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep draft is less than a week old, there is no need to rush to delete. Plausible subject, and the rough translation and peacock issues are not severe enough to merit deletion per WP:NOTCLEANUP. VQuakr (talk) 04:58, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep Agree with Vquakr. Notability is not really a valid deletion rational for MfD. There has to be a particular reason why we can't wait for G13 or allow the creator to work on it more. Galobtter (talkó tuó  mió) 14:12, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.