Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Joshua Travagli

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  Speedy Delete per WP:G4. — Cactus Writer (talk) 16:02, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Joshua Travagli


Fair warning this case involves sockpuppetry. I will be referring the editor in question as Massimo after their first account. Most of the actions described were made using other accounts.

The creation of this draft is pretty clearly an attempt to keep content on the 'pedia despite that fact that it's been deleted several times over from multiple namespaces. Massimo created and recreated articles on this subject several times under a couple of different titles (see Joshua Travagli, Joshua travagli, and Josh Travagli) and frequently enough that two of these three titles needed salting. He then attempted bypass this using the WP namespace (see Joshua travagli), before finally settling on an AfC submission in their own sandbox (see User:Ynaps/sandbox.) After the submission was declined, Massimo resubmitted the draft twice more with no changes made. After the third decline back in March, Massimo stopped, so the draft was deleted per WP:G13 earlier this month, only to be recreated with no changes made about a week later.

As such, I can only conclude that Massimo has no intentions of actually working on this draft, but is just trying force the content to just sit here indefinitely. I worry that if we go through the normal WP:G13 procedure, we'll just wind up back here in six months time with yet another draft recreated immediately after deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 15:54, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Sir Sputnik (talk) 15:54, 20 September 2017 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete per criterion WP:G4 and Articles for deletion/Joshua Travagli. Failing that, delete as disruption. Sockmaster indeffed, so any future recreations would fall under WP:G5. VQuakr (talk) 04:25, 21 September 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.