Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Joust!: A Mighty Medieval Musical

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 20:07, 6 April 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Joust!: A Mighty Medieval Musical


Draft article for a musical that fails WP:GNG. Writer unknown, no RS of any performances other than amateur groups on Youtube videos. Article creator was alerted to this on their talk page in February. Blue Riband► 13:42, 30 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete - Agree. The complete absence of sourcing makes it impossible to know if this is Notable, though I personally doubt it. Though it sounds wonderful! KJP1 (talk) 17:00, 30 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep - This is one of the few times that I will actually !vote Keep on NMFD grounds. If the argument for deletion is only NMFD, then that is no argument.  Robert McClenon (talk) 03:55, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete a draft that is going no where. When did Robert become a convert to NMFD? If we start following NMFD pretty quick we will not be able to deal with hopeless drafts at all. Legacypac (talk) 06:54, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep as per WP:NMFD. In draft space, failure to meet WP:GNG is strictly irrelevant. If it included sources to meet the GNG, it would be moved to article space. Actually this one looks to me as if it might wind up becoming a valid article, although it isn't yet, and may never. No policy-based reason for deletion has been mentioned. "When in doubt, don't delete." DES (talk)DESiegel Contribs 06:53, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Comment I see the argument that a draft is just that - a draft for something in development. However the editor was notified on his/her talk page on February 3 here that the notability might be a problem and to give that consideration before putting an extensive amount of work into it. Since then the editor has not returned to it but has had multiple warnings and an indefinate block as shown here. Unless someone else takes on further development it is likely to languish as is forever. Quite a pity as the editor seems to have a lot of personal knowledge that could be put to constructive use. Blue Riband► 22:47, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete I am sympathetic to the NMFD case but there really is no chance of improvement here now the creator is indef blocked. jcc (tea and biscuits) 22:46, 5 April 2018 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.