Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Judge Neal

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  delete. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 10:37, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

Draft:Judge Neal

 * – (View MfD)

Unsourced BLP where no reliable sources appear to exist. SK2242 (talk) 18:35, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete as an unsourced BLP. Delete if a reliable source can’t be added within 7 days. This is promotion of a non-notable performer, and there is an abundance of promotional sources on social media but none are reliable sources suitable for Wikipedia. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 19:45, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep - There isn't yet a guideline authorizing the deletion of sourced draft biographies of living persons. Authors should have time to find sources, especially on drafts that haven't yet been submitted.  This appears to be ragpicking.
 * Comment - This nomination is biting the newbie. I don't like the guideline against biting the newbie, because it is often misused or misquoted, but this is an example of what the guideline was meant to discourage.  Robert McClenon (talk) 04:54, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
 * This is a drive-by promotion dump, and it is offensive as an unsourced BLP. If the editor comes back, it will be good if the message is clear that writing new material on living people means starting with at least one source.
 * Otherwise, Wikipedia is no different than any of the following:
 * https://www.facebook.com/Neal-Huybens-841602899509299/
 * https://www.linkedin.com/in/neal-huybens-bb5973131/?originalSubdomain=be
 * https://www.pinterest.ch/nealhuybens/_saved/
 * https://skiomusic.com/neal-huybens
 * https://soundcloud.com/ynse-monstrul
 * https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC2vUGr4sx8OdHr4g9CbHmhQ
 * For the sake of dignity of new page reviewers, this should be promptly deletable. "Unsourced BLP" seems the accurate objective criterion, and it is grounded in WP:BLP, which applies in draftspace.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 06:09, 4 February 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete per the WP:BLP policy. --IWI (talk) 01:33, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.