Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Justin Bour

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 16:55, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Justin Bour


Draft on an existing topic Justin Bour. When I redirected the page, I was reverted and the page put back in the AfC list. Since the submitter insists on having a draft approved on a topic we can not accept because it exists, we need to delete this draft. Legacypac (talk) 00:17, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete and redirect and semi-protect. A completely redundant forking of the mainspace article.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 01:01, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete and salt and redirect  and tell user to edit Justin Bour. —DIYeditor (talk) 18:38, 30 April 2018 (UTC) edited 00:24, 1 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete and redirect - Use care in any protection or salting, because the author of the draft has subsequently made edits to the article, and is entitled to make edits to the article. Protection does not appear to be needed.  Just give the user a trout-whale.  Robert McClenon (talk) 23:50, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete, but not for any of the reasons mentioned above. It is normal to draft improvements to existing articles in the draftspace, and it isn't ridiculous that a person might try to use AfC to solicit feedback. I support deletion because this is literally a copy of the mainspace article with the infobox removed. —Compassionate727 (T·C) 21:13, 2 May 2018 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.