Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Kadda Sheekoff (2nd nomination)

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  delete. ✗ plicit  13:43, 8 March 2022 (UTC)

Draft:Kadda Sheekoff

 * – (View MfD) &#8203;

Kadda Sheekoff

This draft has been in review repeatedly and has been rejected five times:

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Kadda_Sheekoff&oldid=1023272727

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Kadda_Sheekoff&oldid=1042496949

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Kadda_Sheekoff&oldid=1033299048

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Kadda_Sheekoff&oldid=1037989278

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Kadda_Sheekoff&oldid=1061051093

The Reject messages were then stripped (although they say that they should not be removed):

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Kadda_Sheekoff&type=revision&diff=1074102465&oldid=1061098309&diffmode=source

There may be paid editing or sockpuppetry, or the resubmission may simply be the work of ultras. It doesn't matter much.

An article by this name, Kadda Sheekoff, was created twice, twelve years ago, and was deleted as A7, no credible claim of significance, and was indefinitely salted at the time. While a great deal can change in twelve years, there is no indication that this person is more notable than they were in 2010, and the tendentious resubmission has resumed. This draft cannot be accepted without unsalting, and there is no reason to unsalt. So the resubmissions of the draft are a waste of time, and the draft should go where the article is, into a bit bucket. Robert McClenon (talk) 19:43, 28 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment - See also Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Kadda Sheekoff, which deleted a draft after an earlier rejection not shown. There is also a history of gaming of names to sneak this into article space under a variant of the title to avoid the salt.  Robert McClenon (talk) 19:52, 28 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete – Draft space is not a repository for pages that can't plausibly become Wikipedia articles, and all these resubmissions are wasting the time of AfC reviewers and other good-faith editors. --bonadea contributions talk 18:02, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:GAMENAME and tendentious resubmission after rejection without improving the article. It still has the same problems as the previous MFD. Nothing has happened in the past two years since previous MFD that warrants him having an article now. AngusW🐶🐶F  ( bark  •  sniff ) 02:59, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.