Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Kallitechnis

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  delete. ✗ plicit  11:47, 17 May 2022 (UTC)

Draft:Kallitechnis

 * – (View MfD) &#8203;

Highly advertorialized and poorly sourced draft, which would have been speediable G13 this week but for a purely technical bot edit in February. While the subject has actually attained a pass of WP:NMUSIC #8 (nomination for a top-level music award) since that time, this draft as written is such a promotionally-written and badly sourced crapfest that I had to create a new stub from scratch rather than using any part of this version -- but we don't want to encourage anybody copy-pasting any of this PR bumf into the mainspace stub, so there's no value in either letting the draft ride out another three months or retaining it as a redirect with all of the advertorialism still accessible in the edit history. We can recreate a redirect to mainspace from the redlink if desired, but the edit history here should be deleted first regardless. Bearcat (talk) 08:35, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Weak Delete as per nominator, since we are here. (But it wouldn't have been G13 until next month anyway.)  Robert McClenon (talk) 16:36, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete This is a redundant draft since the stub exists and is promotinal (JayPlaysStuff &#124; talk to me &#124; What I've been up to) 20:54, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.