Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Keith St John

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  Delete. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:24, 19 October 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Keith St John

 * — Godsy (TALK CONT ) 01:24, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
 * — Godsy (TALK CONT ) 06:12, 1 October 2016 (UTC)
 * — Godsy (TALK CONT ) 06:12, 1 October 2016 (UTC)

The author of this draft is blocked for a username violation.

There is a better draft at User:Melissa Kurland/sandbox. Robert McClenon (talk) 06:40, 23 September 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Redirect. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 00:36, 24 September 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Godsy (TALK CONT ) 06:12, 1 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - No one's going to search "Draft:Keith St John" sO it's a pointless redirect, I know redirects are cheap but IMHO this is would be a useless redirect. – Davey 2010 Talk 01:11, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
 * The "Draft:" string is irrelevant to the search, if done internally draft space will be searched. If no one will ever search for associated pages on "Keith St John", the the redirect would hurt nothing, and if someone does, there will be a hit that the searcher may or may not choose to follow. Readers will not encounter drafts in any case. Draft forks should, on discovery, as a rule, be merged, not deleted. It would be absurd to bring all draft duplications to MfD. Robert should be aware of this. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 12:28, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
 * It's still a pointless redirect and it benefits no one, It doesn't benefit you, or I or the readers, Consensus has always been to delete these and I see nothing different here, – Davey 2010 Talk 02:09, 11 October 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Godsy (TALK CONT ) 01:24, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.