Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Kelly Hyman

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 05:53, 13 March 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Kelly Hyman


Previously deleted as failing WP:ENT in 2017 Articles for deletion/Kelly Hyman the current draft has been declined by 4 different reviewers. An MFD to confirm the AfD and AfC declines is now in order. Then we can CSD recreations. Like alphabet soup but hopefully this makes sense. Legacypac (talk) 20:27, 3 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete - At this point, one week after the AFD, submitting the draft for review again was tendentious. The draft serves no useful purpose.  Four declines and a delete is more than enough. Robert McClenon (talk) 23:18, 3 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete - little potential, no reason to keep it - per AfD --DannyS712 (talk) 00:55, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep. Robert McClenon appears to have misread the year.  The AfD was a week plus two years ago.  I have followed the AfD's  and I see a great many potential sources that are recent, post the Feb 2017 AfD, so no, the draft is not deleteable per the old AfD where the reason for deletion was the lack of quality sources.
 * Looking at the history, I do not see "tendentious". I think people arguing "tendentious" need to supply at least one example diff.  The linked word is being frequently misused here at MfD.
 * I advise the author to follow the advice at WP:THREE. Wikipedia-notability is disputed.  Many weak sources do not help, you need 2 or 3 good sources only to cross the notability bar.    --SmokeyJoe (talk) 04:44, 4 March 2019 (UTC)


 * Soft Delete - User:SmokeyJoe is right in that I misread the date. A delete and four declines is enough.  After two years, this draft isn't likely to be accepted.  It can be re-created later after new notability.  Robert McClenon (talk) 05:59, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Strong delete per Articles for deletion/Kelly Hyman (attorney) which was closed as delete only six months ago. GSS (talk |c|em ) 08:32, 7 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete no improvements in notability since previous AFD's. WP:DEL-REASON: "Articles whose subjects fail to meet the relevant notability guideline (WP:N, WP:GNG, WP:BIO, WP:MUSIC, WP:CORP, and so forth)" and "Articles for which thorough attempts to find reliable sources to verify them have failed"  AngusWOOF  ( bark  •  sniff ) 16:44, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.