Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Kiki's House

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  keep. Salvio 06:45, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

Draft:Kiki's House

 * – (View MfD)

Fails WP:GNG. Draft is an article about a series of YouTube videos, and a Google search returns no coverage on this subject. The Grand Delusion (Send a message) 17:40, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep None of that is a reason for deletion at the draft stage. Notability is not normally relevant at an MfD discussion, and thus neither is the GNG. See Draft:Yogendra Beniwal now being discussed. This is not an AfC draft, and no editor is being asked to spend time reviewing it or responding to it. The creating editor is entitled to attempt to create a valid article about the topic. If this is not possible, that work will be wasted, but an editor can do that if s/he sop chooses. This sort of thjin g should not even be brought to MfD. DES (talk)DESiegel Contribs 21:30, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Procedural close. MfD is not for evaluating notability.  Dubious notability is the reason for it to be in draftspace.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 06:52, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep in draft space. But, User:SmokeyJoe, please explain why this is a procedural close and not a Keep, especially when you sometimes say to Keep non-notable drafts.  Robert McClenon (talk) 18:18, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
 * The nomination makes no valid reason for deletion from Draftspace, and raises notability. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 20:25, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete Meh come back when the YouTube videos have millions of views instead of hundreds, or when it stands a chance of being as notable as Kiki's House of Righteous Music   AngusWOOF  ( bark  •  sniff ) 02:28, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
 * All of that is relevant to whether this should be moved to mainspace. None of it is relevant to whether a draft should be deleted. DES (talk)DESiegel Contribs 14:48, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
 * That the draft has no coverage or no links to the websites indicates it's likely to consider for WP:MADEUP, WP:HOLE and WP:NOTWEBHOST. But yeah you can leave it in draft for now. Canceling vote. It really depends if you think it's U5 (webhost) / G11 (promotion) by existing as a draft. AngusWOOF  ( bark  •  sniff ) 19:45, 12 September 2020 (UTC)


 * Keep per WP:NMFD. — Godsy (TALK CONT ) 13:04, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.