Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Knotel

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 16:15, 24 June 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Knotel


AfC declined 5 times and resubmitted again. Seems like a WP:MILL real estate manager with a short history. The blockchain cryptocurrency play is likely why they want a page so badly on Wikipedia. Legacypac (talk) 03:02, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
 * This looks like sufficient improvement noting the soft decline notice and instructions to editimprove and resubmit. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 03:12, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Question - Has anyone asked whether there is a conflict opf interest? Robert McClenon (talk) 10:21, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Comment - Yet Another Single-Purpose Account Mess (YASPAM). Robert McClenon (talk) 10:21, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes, Promotional Spam.  I wish, really wish, I could get Legacypac to include the word "promotion" when promotion is underlying problem to everything else about hte draft.  NOTPROMOTION is the easiesst reason for deletion.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 10:54, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete. This is why WP:GS/Crypto exists. Summarily deleting tendentiously resubmitted drafts without wasting time at MFD is well within the scope of the existing sanctions. I would have done so if it weren't nominated here. MER-C 10:05, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.