Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Kriti Chopra Miss Heart and Soul British Columbia 2016

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  Delete. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 11:25, 16 July 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Kriti Chopra Miss Heart and Soul British Columbia 2016


Fails V and N and abandoned. Also I've never heard of this title in BC. Legacypac (talk) 16:36, 7 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep. It doesn't fail WP:V: sources appear to be available online. Notability is irrelevant. WP:IDONTKNOWIT. VQuakr (talk) 22:54, 11 July 2017 (UTC)


 * Turns out the page is slightly misleading. She did not win the non-notable Miss BC/Miss British Columbia which is not even mentioned on Wikipedia, she got a consolation prize at that pageant where, if I count correctly, every participant walked out with some sort of Miss/Mrs/Miss Teen title for showing up.  This is a useless draft with zero prospect of becoming an article unless the subject accomplishes something quite different and significant in the future. WP:STALE point 6 applies here. . Legacypac (talk) 01:41, 12 July 2017 (UTC)
 * WP:STALE #6: if of no potential and problematic even if blanked, seek deletion. Your nomination doesn't address why this is such an exceptional case that the guideline for user space should be applied to this draft, or why it would be problematic even if blanked, let alone established what searches you performed in order to ascertain that this draft is of no potential. VQuakr (talk) 04:23, 12 July 2017 (UTC)
 * I've clearly established why this draft has zero potential. In fact I've put in 10 times the effort to explain this to you than the creator did to make this pointless useless page. Legacypac (talk) 04:50, 12 July 2017 (UTC)
 * You haven't established that, you've repeatedly claimed it - juxtaposed with irrelevant statements about notability and trivially falsifiable claims about verifiability. VQuakr (talk) 07:10, 12 July 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.