Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Kudos Chemie Ltd

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: speedy deleted as WP:G10 by admin  (procedural close). (non-admin closure) Alpha3031 (t • c) 08:28, 3 April 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Kudos Chemie Ltd


Per WP:GREATWRONGS/WP:NOT. This isn't going to be an article, ever. Kleuske (talk) 10:12, 29 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete Completely unencyclopedic Zingarese talk  ·  contribs  14:08, 29 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Strong delete per nom. — python coder   (talk &#124; contribs) 19:44, 29 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete - Illustrates the limitations of U5 and G10. Because in draft space, cannot be tagged as improper web hosting.  Because corporations are persons but are not living persons, cannot be tagged as attack page.  The underlying reasons for G10 and U5 do apply.  Robert McClenon (talk) 02:46, 30 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete per G10. G10 is not limited to people, but is for all pages that serve no other purpose than to disparage their subject. See Wikipedia talk:Criteria for speedy deletion/Archive 61 jni(talk)(delete) 10:57, 30 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete per G10 as a page that disparage[s] ... their subject ... and serve[s] no other purpose (and tagging). Negative unsourced BLPs are one specific form of G10 but not the only form (hence db-attackorg. May also fall under the snowball clause. Alpha3031 (t • c) 06:33, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.