Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Lando

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  delete.  —&#8288;Scotty Wong &#8288;— 04:59, 7 June 2022 (UTC)

Draft:Lando

 * – (View MfD) &#8203;

Copy/paste of the German de:Lando (Graffitik%C3%BCnstler) No single reason, but multiple non-fatal reasons taken together means this is already a stale draft:
 * no attribution of original .de WP
 * not English, and no attempt or request to translate
 * bad title - will never reside at target, but just annoys me editing the dab
 * 4 months stale, so in 2 more it's a speedy
 * not even clear this isn't a test edit Widefox ; talk 17:20, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Two, maybe three of the sources are acceptable and one of them is big enough to add toward notability. But there's also pure spam, here, and as Widefox says, there's all kinds of other problems. I looked at it to see if it's worthwhile working on it, but I don't see that. Drmies (talk) 17:25, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Weak Delete only because the MFD nomination has restarted the calendar, so that it will now run for another 6 months unless we delete it. It had needed declining in January when I declined it, and it needed leaving alone, but wasn't left alone.  Robert McClenon (talk) 02:13, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Should the draft policy be edited so an MfD nomination doesn't restart the clock? Newyorkbrad (talk) 06:00, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Status quo ante: OK Robert McClenon, I wasn't aware my nom had the side effect of resetting the clock. Logically a failed MfD doesn't change the draft, and nothing comes to my mind why an MfD Keep close would want to reset the clock. So yes, I'd be in favour of changing the draft policy, surprised we have this jeopardy per WP:SNOW / WP:NORESCUE (rather than WP:TNT). An improvement sooner is better than an improvement later. (specifically with this case, we have a .de WP:CFORK instead of per WP:RFT creating an English stub and translating from the .de article, so is a procedural WP:NORESCUE) Widefox ; talk 07:32, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete per Widefox.  starship .paint  (exalt) 03:23, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.