Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Language Technology Centre

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was keep (withdrawn by nominator). JohnCD (talk) 21:27, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

Draft:Language Technology Centre


rejected 3 times for a combination of lack of notability and advertising. No real hope of improvement  DGG ( talk ) 20:11, 23 November 2014 (UTC)

Thank you for suggesting a course of action for the draft article. I would like to discuss the consideration for deletion by  DGG regarding this page. Firstly, may I please propose a correction to the reasons for deletion, because the rejections do not include a lack of notability. The first rejection (advertising) may have been for the right reason, but was not helpful in explaining how to improve the article - this is mentioned by EuroCarGT in the second review. The second rejection (advertising) explained how to improve the article and subsequently the third rejection was for reliable sources, given that the entities were not referenced directly/correctly. I have tried to correct the quality of the references to correct sources. The article has notability because the company was the manufacturer of the first translation management system, also known as a globalization management system, which is important software in the translation and localization industry. This is supported by a reliable source and recognised author and consultant in the industry, Jost Zetzsche. I would like to request that the article be reviewed and suggestions made to improve this correctly, as I have made efforts to do so following previous comments. Thanks. Kuleanna (talk) 14:29, 4 December 2014 (UTC)


 * I'm withdrawing the MfD,since the article is being actively worked on.  DGG ( talk ) 20:54, 5 December 2014 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.