Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Laura with me

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  snow delete. Reaper Eternal (talk) 01:24, 4 May 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Laura with me

 * – (View MfD)

Including other drafts by same creator:
 * – (View MfD)
 * – (View MfD)

Unquestionably non-notable film with no mentions in any sources whatsoever. It doesn't meet the letter of WP:G3, WP:G11 or WP:U5, so I'm coming here instead. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  10:38, 1 May 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. Rubbish computer (Talk: Contribs) 11:11, 1 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Unsourced promotion of non notable film, and of the amatures involved. That’s G11. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 12:00, 1 May 2019 (UTC)
 * So User:Yunshui disagrees? Not blatant enough? A seventeen year old with a camera is vanity posting all over WikiMedia projects, posting his name, his familiy’s, and his friend also involved.  If that’s not promotion, what is?  Does there have to be a sale pitch?  Add to that the fact that it is completely unsourced, and unsourceable, and it is not just requiring a fundamental rewrite, it simply cannot be rewritten.  The author is a self-promoting troll. Check the deleted contributions. This is squarely G11, even if you have to look harder than “blatant”, which is not a G11 word. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 13:52, 1 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Please see your talkpage. Also Delete, obviously. Yunshui 雲 水 14:05, 1 May 2019 (UTC)


 * delete Although this falls far short of relevant CSD criteria, it also looks beyond repair. Per Richie33 above.  Dloh Cier  ekim  12:15, 1 May 2019 (UTC)
 * see Sockpuppet investigations/Alfwin Fernando. Given that there are this many socks, I think it is safe to assume that there is some other blocked account out there that predates the current named master. One of you or a passing may wish to G5 it (or IAR or whatever.) TonyBallioni (talk) 16:08, 1 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Also, looking into this, they weirdly created all of those accounts except one from their main account in an attempt to make it so the user exists so they could put up a user page. One of them was created independently and had no public connection. Still exceptionally weird. TonyBallioni (talk) 16:28, 1 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete with chlorine bleach, which is used to wash socks. Sometimes it is easier just to go with MFD than to figure out what CSD criterion to use.  Robert McClenon (talk) 17:40, 1 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete the lot, for the reasons given above. -- Hoary (talk) 12:28, 2 May 2019 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.