Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Law of Wikipedia

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  Delete. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 13:49, 16 February 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Law of Wikipedia


Qualifies for deletion as a violation of No original research. North America1000 13:10, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete Serves no purpose, is factually incorrect and misleading, and as pointed out, unsourced OR. Basically a hoax :) O Fortuna!  ...Imperatrix mundi.  13:15, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete Never going to be of any use. As well as the above, if it ever happened to be moved to article space it would be a speedy A11. Meters (talk) 19:39, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete as nonsense. The title sounds like an interesting ProjectSpace essay title, but the minimal content doesn't match.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 03:41, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.