Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Lead Man

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  delete. ✗ plicit  10:33, 28 February 2024 (UTC)

Draft:Lead Man

 * – (View MfD) &#8203;

The sole provided source contains no mention of this draft's topic area. The article additionally reads like a storytelling and does not follow any existing style conventions. The creator was active for one day in the account's history and has not returned in the following month.

This draft makes far-fetched, uncited claims with no accompanying qualifiers or citations.  Dionysius Miller talk 21:11, 20 February 2024 (UTC)


 * Delete this draft looks terrible. Catfurball (talk) 21:23, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete due to surpassing WP:NDRAFT due to the disingenuous false referencing, the far fetched claims appear to be cited in the given reference but they are not. Warn the author. SmokeyJoe (talk) 22:02, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
 * WP:HOAX, yes. SmokeyJoe (talk) 01:00, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete as a hoax. Robert McClenon (talk) 00:39, 22 February 2024 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom Flux55 (my talk page) 00:58, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Seeing how blatantly fictional this is, isn't this liable for db-hoax? Flux55 (my talk page) 01:25, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Nah. You have to read the reference to find for sure that the content is not sourced from it, that it is not a matter of editable misstatement etc. SmokeyJoe (talk) 02:20, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Burn it with fire, likely AI generated. Tehonk (talk) 02:37, 22 February 2024 (UTC)


 * Comment - Read the hoax guideline, which states that hoaxes are only speedy-deletable as G3 if they are obvious. This article requires review to see that it is a hoax, and so it should be deleted after a deletion discussion (this deletion discussion).  Robert McClenon (talk) 13:31, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.