Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Lekhasri Samantsinghar

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete. Killiondude (talk) 06:47, 11 June 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Lekhasri Samantsinghar


Long abandoned AfC submission that was rightly declined. After it was tagged as a promising draft I looked into the page carefully and found the subject fails any applicable inclusion criteria. My removal of the "promising draft" tag was reverted and I'm being told no one can remove this tag and we have to use MfD. So here we are. I expect the tag placer and replacer to defend this draft enough to convince us it belongs in mainspace since they want to permanently insulate a worthless draft from normal deletion process. Legacypac (talk) 23:23, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete as too much promotion and too much of the sources being completely unsuitable (Facebook) and “mere mention”s. At best, WP:TNT. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 23:44, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete--Not notable.Period. ~ Winged Blades Godric 05:59, 3 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete - If this hadn't been tagged as promising, it could wait a few months, but, since it is pseudo-promising, we have to decide now that the promise is nonsense. Robert McClenon (talk) 02:23, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete as not notable, and no improvements made to the article since 2016. This is what G13 is for — this shouldn't be at MfD. Brad  v  12:34, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.