Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Lester Randolph Ford Award

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was Delete. — xaosflux  Talk 23:57, 10 April 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Lester Randolph Ford Award


Word-for-word copy of de:Lester Randolph Ford Award. Not a UP#COPY because it's not in userspace, and not an A2 candidate because it's not in articlespace. Maybe we could call it a G12 violation since there's no attribution? In any event, it's long abandoned, and thereby an abuse of draftspace. —/M endaliv /2¢/Δ's/ 09:21, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete I also agree that the misuse of draftspace in this manner was never endorsed.  I was personally toying with nominating for deletion, but wanted to get a chance on the grounds that perhaps the translation may have revealed something becasue we don't have a list of the award winners. Hasteur (talk) 13:13, 24 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep. No indication that this isn't a notable topic. why not blank instead? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 166.176.57.187 (talk) 20:23, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Because it's an unattributed copy of an article from another Wikipedia. If it were in articlespace it'd be a CSD candidate. You can't just copy-and-paste content without attributing it and then abandon it. Blanking is not sufficient to address that problem, and for that matter it's not in userspace: I'm not aware of blanking being an option for draftspace. It is not reasonably likely that this will ever be used. If someone wants it they can go to German Wikipedia at any time. —/M endaliv /2¢/Δ's/ 23:45, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 03:56, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - per nom and Hasteur. 68.107.181.186 (talk) 17:35, 6 April 2016 (UTC)  Onel 5969  TT me 17:40, 6 April 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.