Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Levi Sharan

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 16:46, 6 October 2021 (UTC)

Draft:Levi Sharan

 * – (View MfD) &#8203;

The draft clearly qualifies for CSD#G13 because the last page edit was on December 29, 2020. I had tagged it with. But it was rejected because (get this!) merely requesting deletion was considered a human edit, hence it won't qualify now for speedy deletion for another 6 months!!! This utterly defeats the purpose of this process...  P 1 9 9  ✉ 17:51, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete. The last human edit was in may, when UnitedStatesian moved the page to a different title. That being said this has no chance of ever becoming an article as an unsourced autobiography on a person that doesn't make any kind of Credible claim of significance, "This person exists and is a Christian" is not a reasonable basis for an article. Keeping this for another 6 months just to let the arbitrary timer run down just seems like pointless bureaucracy. 192.76.8.74 (talk) 19:34, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete - The last substantive human edit can reasonably be argued to have been on 29 Dec 2020, because the edit by User:UnitedStatesian was made to comply with the MOS. Their MOS edit was not intended to keep it alive, as opposed to making cosmetic edits to a valid draft to keep it alive.  A combination of common sense about what G13 is about, and common sense about a dead end draft, say delete this.  Robert McClenon (talk) 05:23, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment - Maybe a lesson should be that good-faith editors should not make MOS edits to crud. I would prefer not to teach that lesson, because MOS editing should not be discouraged if it is done sensibly (and it was).
 * Delete: “Delete as an unsourced WP:BLP”. SmokeyJoe (talk) 22:16, 5 October 2021 (UTC)


 * “utterly defeats the purpose of this process”. The purpose of the process that is WP:G13 is to clear out the small proportion but large numbers from tens of thousands of unlatched abandoned drafts the BLP and Copyright violations. This is why G13 exists. If a gnome does MOS edits, it means that have at least looked at it and implicitly assessed no obvious BLP or Copyrights violations. Therefore the underlying purpose is not required. There is no reason to for angst over gnome game edits giving abandoned drafts another six months. SmokeyJoe (talk) 22:21, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.