Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Lie's formula (2nd nomination)

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: keep. (non-admin closure) TheSandDoctor (talk) 02:12, 7 March 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Lie's formula


Page last improved in 2014. Kept at an MFD in 2016 but deleted G13 and refunded on request 6 months ago. Up for deletion again. Legacypac (talk) 09:46, 28 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep: for the same reason as before (this is still a valid topic; didn’t become less notable). — Taku (talk) 10:59, 28 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep - This is still a valid topic. There is no need for active deletion of topics.  Either tweak it every four months, or let it go G13 bye-bye, but nominating it for deletion is silly.  Robert McClenon (talk) 18:31, 3 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep I'm not sure it needs a stand-alone article (as opposed to fitting into some other page on Lie theory), but drafts don't have to be drafts of entire pages. XOR&#39;easter (talk) 17:15, 4 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep per above. Paul August &#9742; 01:06, 5 March 2018 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.