Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:List of American theatrical animated features

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: Delete without prejudice for restoring to a user sandbox via WP:REFUND (feel free to ask at my talk as well). — xaosflux  Talk 17:15, 28 May 2019 (UTC)

Draft:List of American theatrical animated features

 * Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 11:56, 17 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 11:56, 17 May 2019 (UTC)

Yet another case of WP:TRIVIA; a list of trivia not backed by sources that would be better served in a category. Jalen D. Folf  (talk)  00:27, 4 May 2019 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep. Ignore.  It’s not going anywhere, and it is not doing any harm.  It looks like an unregistered newcomer is trying to use draftspace as userspace.  Advise them of WP:DUD and to WP:Register. Trivia is ok in userspace.  —SmokeyJoe (talk) 00:55, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Alternative proposal: Move the draft to User:Connorm2000/List of American theatrical animated features per the comments above. WP:DUD applies and this user as possibly the only user linked with all these edits can make any desired changes themselves. Jalen D. Folf   (talk)  02:34, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Agree. Tentatively assume that the IP is and userfy.  I think this could be a useful notes page for this user, and it is not an article draft.  --04:09, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Neutral:
 * Doesn't need deleting yet.
 * See Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. I would decline it on that basis if it were submitted from draft space for AFC review.
 * Is User:Connorm2000 the same as the IP editor? If so, welcome to registered editing.  In any case, welcome to registered editing.
 * Concur that this would be better implemented as a category. Robert McClenon (talk) 03:25, 4 May 2019 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 11:56, 17 May 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.