Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Lord of Little Stambridge Hall

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  deleted per G7 (author-requested). Procedural close, discussion is moot since the draft no longer exists. Multiple !votes cite G7, so this discussion should not be viewed as a decision to delete for the purposes of G4. (IAR, NAC). (non-admin closure) VQuakr (talk) 18:27, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

Draft:Lord of Little Stambridge Hall

 * – (View MfD)

The page has no real sources at the present and should be delted EvWills (talk) 11:37, 1 February 2021 (UTC)


 * Note that EvWills created the draft. It was pointed out at the Teahouse (after I advised them to come here) that G7 may apply. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 12:40, 1 February 2021 (UTC)


 * Comment I was perhaps premature on talking about salt, I was just concerned about preventing a similar rigaramole in future . The topic was initially created in mainspace and moved to draft, then created in mainspace under a similar title and speedied under A11, recreated in mainspace, speedied under A10 and moved back to draft. Moved into article space then back into draft. Declined twice at AfC and and finally rejected. Rejection then affirmed at Teahouse (147). Lot of hands. Regards, Zindor (talk) 13:19, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Zindor Hi, with regards to salt, this has been one of my first ventures into page creation and i now further understand correct practices and protocol. if i was to recreate the page when i had compiled a list of sources and evidence and direct
 * information. I would not go about moving the article from Draft to article, but rather go about it through placing it under review.
 * I now also understand page creation takes months if not years. many, many thanks for all the help EvWills (talk) 15:09, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Thanks, EvWills. You're always welcome at the Teahouse, let us know if you need any help in future. All the best, Zindor (talk) 22:25, 1 February 2021 (UTC)


 * Comment - This seems to be transcluded twice in the listing of 1 February nominations. Robert McClenon (talk) 16:42, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Fixed Zindor (talk) 17:19, 2 February 2021 (UTC)


 * Weak Delete as a G7 request made via MFD. Robert McClenon (talk) 16:42, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete per G7. it is not possible to make a non-notable topic notable through editing. You may find editing existing articles less frustrating while you learn the norms of this site. VQuakr (talk) 18:55, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 10:17, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.