Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Luca Rallis

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  Delete. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 10:48, 18 April 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Luca Rallis


An article identical to the draft has been speedy deleted as A7 a couple of times, and it appears to be clear that this person does not yet meet Wikipedia's notability criteria. That is not a condemnation of the person - after all, most people don't meet those peculiar criteria.

Normally, that wouldn't be a very strong reason to delete a recently created draft, but since the subject is a child, I believe that it would be better not to keep the draft around. This is content that could not plausibly become a Wikipedia article. bonadea contributions talk 05:19, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 13:23, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. --TheSandDoctor (talk) 03:44, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.