Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Ludwig Albert

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  Delete. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 16:14, 19 January 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Ludwig Albert


Declined 4 times because of concerns that still exist now and it was resubmitted a 4th time now, so there's no convincing of an acceptable article. SwisterTwister  talk  18:51, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

* delete I agree, editor just resubmitting with even less references each of the last times (now down to just one). Process appears to be going nowhere and feels more like an attempt to promote than to write an Encyclopedic article. KylieTastic (talk) 19:00, 7 January 2017 (UTC)
 * The user has come forward asking for help on my talk page, and they were apparently removing refs as they thought that matched the advise given. I am willing to give them another chance but I have said they need to add as many references they can find "that talk about the subject in detail" - so per Assume good faith as they have reached... worth another chance. KylieTastic (talk) 23:34, 7 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Comment - This draft has been resubmitted without addressing the concern about peacock language. The author should be strongly advised to request assistance in putting this draft into a neutral tone before resubmitting it, or it will be deleted.  Robert McClenon (talk) 03:34, 9 January 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.