Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:MONEY: A GOOD MOTIVATOR OR NOT?

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  Delete. RL0919 (talk) 22:04, 23 November 2018 (UTC)

Draft:MONEY: A GOOD MOTIVATOR OR NOT?


Also, by same author, almost the same:

Another trash essay that is not suitable for Wikipedia per WP:NOTESSAY and has no chance of going into the mainspace. No one is going to bother to read about what one person thinks about money. Pkbwcgs (talk) 21:55, 15 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Legacypac (talk) 23:31, 15 November 2018 (UTC)
 * User:David.moreno72 should have rejected, not declined. There is no hope for this to be made suitable.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 06:44, 16 November 2018 (UTC)
 * User:SmokeyJoe - Please stop dumping on reviewers for declining rather than rejecting. As discussed below, the feature is still in beta, and doesn't work for some reviewers.  It is not helpful to divert attention from deleting crud by complaining that the reviewer used the wrong method of saying no (even if they could have).  Robert McClenon (talk) 23:14, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Are we talking about it not working for some reviewers somewhere? It needs a manual setup.  I’ve been talking about the reject option for three years now, it is hard to accept that AfC is still playing with toes in the water. MfD is the wrong place to deal with useless harmless junk.  Maybe if now Pkbwcgs can get the option installed, he can reject things that should be rejected instead of second guessing the decline choice by bringing useless harmless pages to MfD. I note that if another review decline, to reject you have to resubmit it to get the reject option. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 23:21, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
 * I have enabled the AFCH script manually but I don't know yet if rejecting works. Pkbwcgs (talk) 09:41, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Rejecting does not work for some of us yet. Software configuration thing. Legacypac (talk) 19:36, 16 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Really? Oh dear?  Is this being discussed anywhere?  —SmokeyJoe (talk) 02:46, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Rejecting doesn't work for me either. Pkbwcgs (talk) 10:23, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
 * See Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation. You have to disable the default gadget (go to Special:Preferences and Disable/uncheck) "Yet Another AFC Helper Script: easily review Articles for creation submissions, Files for Upload, redirect and category requests" and go to your common.js (mine is User:SmokeyJoe/common.js, swap in your username) and add "importScript('User:Enterprisey/afch-dev.js'); // Linkback: User:Enterprisey/afch-dev.js" --SmokeyJoe (talk) 11:15, 17 November 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. jni (delete)...just not interested 18:11, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete both. They are almost the same.  Robert McClenon (talk) 23:15, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. —  python coder    (talk &#124; contribs) 02:42, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.