Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Madan Gowri

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  delete. ✗ plicit  01:33, 25 February 2022 (UTC)

Draft:Madan Gowri

 * – (View MfD) &#8203;

This is getting absurd, the creator has no intention of imporving said draft and it has been deleted nearly a dozen times in mainspace and as a draft. Creator (and a sock) continue to edit tendentiously, repeatedly submitting after decline, rejection, afds, deletion. This is just becoming a honeypot for a spammer and isn't notable as decided numerous times. CUPIDICAE💕 16:36, 17 February 2022 (UTC)

Comment, @Praxidicae, The creator of this draft is User:APPU. I had expanded it thinking the subject is notable but did not move to main space since I could not find more reliable english sources. I think a better option would be to indefinitely protect it. The subject is one of the most popular youtubers in Southern India and there are sources with WP:SIGCOV in Tamil language. I'm planning to expand it when I have time. - SUN EYE 1  17:00, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
 * I disagree there is sigcov, as with much of Indian media, it's puffery, churnalism and blatant paid for publications. In fact, the top sources for him are simply interviews, and not independent coverage. CUPIDICAE💕  17:01, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
 * @Praxidicae, I said there are sigcov in Tamil Language. - SUN EYE 1  17:04, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
 * I don't see how that changes anything that I said. CUPIDICAE💕  17:05, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
 * @Praxidicae The subject publishes his videos in Tamil language and there is more coverage in Tamil than english. I'll just create it again when I find it notable then. - SUN EYE 1  17:14, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Again, that doesn't change my statement. Churnalism exists in all languages. Tamil is no different. Also please do not ping me for every response. Thanks. CUPIDICAE💕  17:15, 17 February 2022 (UTC)


 * delete and salt. Repeat spam. The number of subscribers, views, likes, etc don't affect notability – unless there is independent and secondary discussion of it. --bonadea contributions talk 21:49, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete: Delete as already determined to be not notable as Articles for deletion/Madan Gowri (2nd nomination). It is also too promotional. Forbid recreation anywhere, unless limited to listing WP:THREE, not more, sources, and getting agreement that yes the person is now notable.  SmokeyJoe (talk) 00:20, 18 February 2022 (UTC)
 * A finding by consensus at AfD that the topic is not notable is a valid prejudice against drafting in draftspace.  MfD can does and should take note of the AfD consensus. AfD is the forum for testing notability and should be respected for that.
 * If a topic advocate wants to overturn the AfD consensus, the method is WP:THREE, not pedestrian re-creation. SmokeyJoe (talk) 11:09, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete based on the combination of deletion from article space, tendentious submission after rejection, and sockpuppetry. (Deletion from article space is not in itself a reason to delete a draft, but tendentious resubmission is.)  Robert McClenon (talk) 01:41, 18 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Tendentious resubmission is not a sufficient reason to delete a draft on a notable topic. SmokeyJoe (talk) 11:10, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.