Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Mahaveer Group - RSPL

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was Keep - for now. — xaosflux  Talk 03:22, 15 April 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Mahaveer Group - RSPL


Created by user who has since been blocked for sockpuppetry.

Not using CSD because it was created before the block. Robert McClenon (talk) 02:45, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete inappropriate and deleted before. Legacypac (talk) 03:53, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep. This is what drafts are for. It's fairly clear that what happened here is that a new user tried to post promotional articles about himself and his company, and when they were deleted found a friend with a little previous WP experience to help. They are going about it quite the wrong way and seem unwilling to take advice, so I salted the article title and told them to work on the draft. The present draft is hopeless (trimmed back to almost nothing in reaction to being told that previous ones were too promotional) but the company exists and may be notable; the author is only blocked for a week, and we should be encouraging the use of drafts by COI authors. JohnCD (talk) 08:58, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. Let's not give a head start to the next editor they hire to write their promotional article. Thparkth (talk) 18:55, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep If the creator had been indeffed, I might have said delete. But since the block was only for one week, we can hope that this is a learning experience for the new user. Drafts are cheep. —teb728 t c 04:35, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep. This isn't in userspace so other people could work on the draft. We can come back to this page if say nothing has been done in six months or even a year. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 21:58, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep - I understand the initial nom for deleting, but in light of the comments by JohnCD, I think this is the appropriate way to deal with this COI article. 68.107.181.186 (talk) 17:31, 6 April 2016 (UTC)  Onel 5969  TT me 17:41, 6 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep per JohnCD. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 10:18, 10 April 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.