Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Man-Wolf (film)

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  keep.  bibliomaniac 1  5  03:00, 6 June 2020 (UTC)

Draft:Man-Wolf (film)

 * – (View MfD)

I put this draft up for speedy deletion already as it is based on information from an unreliable source that has not been backed by sufficient evidence of development or notability from the studio, but that has been undone. The source in question is from The Illuminerdi, which is an WP:UNRELIABLESOURCE, and in the article, they mention a source of theirs is close to the studio without providing any concrete evidence of credibility from the source or studio, rendering this draft to be based on a rumor.

Two other drafts have been made using articles from this site, being Draft:Solo (upcoming film) and Draft:Spider-Woman (film), which I am also requesting for deletion as they are not reliable. There are also several redirects that have been made from these pages that are overloaded and unnecessary for inclusion, those being listed below: Trailblazer101 (talk) 14:56, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Draft:Man-Wolf
 * Draft:ManWolf
 * Draft:Man Wolf
 * Draft:Man Wolf (upcoming film)
 * Draft:ManWolf (upcoming film)
 * Draft:Man-Wolf (upcoming film)
 * Draft:ManWolf (film)
 * Draft:Solo (film)


 * Keep. These are all now redirects, and are not tagged for MfD, or WP:RfD.  Just leave them all alone.  One day, someone will clean up all the ancient draftspace redirects, a honorable and worthless task.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 06:59, 27 May 2020 (UTC)


 * Keep (I'm the creator). Not Necessary. Starzoner (talk) 16:00, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
 * I'm actually fine keeping those drafts up for now as I have expanded them to a proper format. I just think some of those redirects should be deleted as we don't need that many redirects to a draft. Trailblazer101 (talk) 19:23, 27 May 2020 (UTC)


 * Well, if you had approached me on my talk page about it, I would have tagged them for deletion. Since the route went down the road of MFD, I may just leave the redirects for trasparency for the 7 days. Starzoner (talk) 01:15, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
 * I had previously tagged them for deletion, but it was undone, so I took it here instead. If you want to, you could put up the redirects for deletion yourself assuming the consensus here doesn't change. Trailblazer101 (talk) 01:19, 29 May 2020 (UTC)


 * Close, and let the author, deal with them at his leisure, prompted optionally by .  Starzoner may place db-g7 on any page he made and doesn't want anymore.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 05:48, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep Quality of sources is not a valid reason to delete, or even nominate, a draft at MfD. Finding better sources is one of the things drafts are for. There may be a batter source or sources available, in which case this might become a valid article. If not, no harm, done. DES (talk)DESiegel Contribs 01:16, 2 June 2020 (UTC)


 * Keep unless it's a hoax film or tendentiously submitted in its current unreliably sourced state. AngusWOOF  ( bark  •  sniff ) 02:38, 5 June 2020 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.