Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Matt Carriker

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 01:44, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Matt Carriker


Creator is CU blocked. ~ Rob 13 Talk 01:40, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. this isn't WP:G5? VQuakr (talk) 03:54, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Not that I can be sure about, no. All accounts I found related to this were not currently blocked at the time. ~ Rob 13 Talk 04:23, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. TonyBallioni (talk) 04:21, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete as promotion, enitrely built on promotional and unreliable sources. G11 applies.  WP:TNT at a minimum.  The nomination rationale is inadequate.  Very disappointing, User:BU Rob13, TonyBallioni.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 08:05, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete G11. Legacypac (talk) 15:47, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep No reason to delete per G11. Flipyap 13:19, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
 * CU blocked as a sock of the creator. ~ Rob 13 Talk 23:19, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete No potential for an article .It essentially amounts to promotion of the person's activities DGG ( talk ) 22:42, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.