Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Mauro Mori

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: no consensus. No consensus to delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 20:22, 12 April 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Mauro Mori


Declined 6 times and submitted yet again. If the proponent of this page really wants it in main space they should move it themselves and stop wasting our time with resubmits without solving the decline reasons. Legacypac (talk) 07:21, 5 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Close. Decline mfd nomination, no reason given for deletion. Repeated submissions means the author is following the instructions at face value, a fault of the afc templates. Legacypac should stop wasting mfd time with non-nominations. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 07:30, 5 April 2018 (UTC)
 * If you looked at the Draft you could see this has been submitted over and over without improvement for a very long time. It will never go G13 like this.  Unless someone can make a strong case why this is a viable subject we need to purge it from the system. Legacypac (talk) 07:38, 5 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Disagree that resubmission is a reason for deletion. What is a “viable subject”? —SmokeyJoe (talk) 08:08, 5 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Viable as in would survive NPR without being deleted. Legacypac (talk) 08:47, 5 April 2018 (UTC)
 * With my NPR hat on, it looks a bit promotional, and the current content lacks secondary source material (sourced commentary, adjectives). The first source is no good, but no.s 2 and 3 are ok looking.  I’d approve, but would feel obliged to spend time editing.  The current version is heavy on facts and light on coverage that is present in the sources.  —SmokeyJoe (talk) 10:46, 5 April 2018 (UTC)


 * Comment - Has the originator been asked about conflict of interest? This reads like a case of promotional editing, possibly an autobiography.  Robert McClenon (talk) 16:06, 5 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep The major problem with this is the wording of the lead paragraph. That can be fixed easily enough. More sources may also be needed, and those may or may not be available. But lack of sources is not a valid reason to delete a draft, as per WP:NMFD. MfD is not intended to determine if a subject is "viable" by which i take it is meant "plausibly notable". There may be a COI here, but COI editing is not a reason for deletion, nor even for rejection of an AfC Draft. Lack of demonstrated notability is a reason for declining to approve the draft, but not for deletion. There is no deadline here, or shouldn't be. DES (talk)DESiegel Contribs 17:46, 5 April 2018 (UTC)
 * comment I have revised the lead paragraph to remove puffery, and for standard format. i have added a couple of citations. I have added a critical r3eactions section, which should be expanded further. A google books search shows several additional sources in Italian, which I do not read enough to use and cite. If someone who can adds content from those, this might be ready for mainspace. DES (talk)DESiegel Contribs 19:30, 6 April 2018 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.