Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Maya Gold Foundation

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  delete.  bibliomaniac 1  5  21:09, 1 May 2020 (UTC)

Draft:Maya Gold Foundation

 * – (View MfD)

Rejected 5 times, without improvement. I listed this as a G11, but another admin removed the tag. Hopeless advertising, and not even notable--if it ever becomes notable it would need a complete rewrite from scratch  DGG ( talk ) 17:18, 19 April 2020 (UTC)

Hello, I have made significant rewrites each time with feedback and references to similar pages. As I told the last admin I am working on this in good faith. We are in the middle of a pandemic so I am not sure what the rush is to delete a draft page when I have said that I am working on it and will do so in accordance with Wikipedia guidelines and input from the admins. If you look at the revisions from the first submission to the current and the conversations you will see that I made all changes in terms of sourcing, copyright, coi, attribution and content. It is not ready I understand, but I am workign on it.

Mswerdloff (talk) 21:44, 19 April 2020 (UTC)mswerdloff
 * Delete - Well, it's only been rejected twice and declined three times (not rejected 5 times). One resubmission after a rejection is too much, enough for deletion.  I notice that the conflict of interest editor has only tried to discuss after it has been nominated for deletion, not after any of the declines or rejections.  I would be more nearly willing to let the editor keep trying if they had discussed after the first deletion or the first rejection.  It is still not ready.  Not every 501(c)(3) is notable, because it is a run-of-the-mill non-profit, and no amount of editing can compensate for lack of notability.  Robert McClenon (talk) 02:24, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
 * even after a rejection, in may still be possible for someone sufficiently resourceful to rescue the draft--I have not seen it often, but I have seen it. : "reject" is not meant to be final. Deletion is- (more precisely, semi-final--delete and protect is what's actually final) DGG ( talk ) 02:53, 20 April 2020 (UTC).


 * User:Anthony_Appleyard should explain his CSD#G11 de-tagging. No meaningful edit summary, no explanation. Draft talk:Maya Gold Foundation provides a hist, the page was speedy deleted, and then a very short time later a REFUND request was honored.  I suspect that Anthony_Appleyard didn't intend the action as a decline of DGG's tagging.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 03:46, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
 * has been working for more than year on this and only this topic, and at Draft talk:Maya Gold Foundation requested another thirty days, then date was 2 April 2020. Not unreasonable, but User:Mswerdloff is making the common newcomer mistake of starting their Wikipedia career devoted to a single draft.  He should instead attempt to improve mainspace content.  Is there any page where a mention of the Maya Gold Foundation could be made?  If not, then it is very unlikely that this organisation can be considered notable.  Was Maya Gold notable?  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 04:02, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
 * I was asked to undelete it, with pleading and reasons, so I undeleted it. It seems that, here as sometimes, I can't satisfy everybody all at the same time. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 04:16, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
 * happens to me also, about once a week. If there's a request that seems reasonable, I do a quick check and try to fulfill it, but sometimes it's not as straightforward as it seems or there is something I had not  noticed, or people just disagree. .  DGG ( talk ) 00:47, 21 April 2020 (UTC)  DGG ( talk ) 00:47, 21 April 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete Problematic draft that is unnecessarily clogging up the system. Sulfurboy (talk) 04:56, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.