Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Meg Crafters

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: Delete. — xaosflux  Talk 12:01, 10 August 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Meg Crafters

 * (Time stamp for bot to properly relist.) North America1000 01:15, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
 * (Time stamp for bot to properly relist.) North America1000 01:15, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

Draft for a non-notable YouTuber Ricky81682 (talk) 18:15, 23 July 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Move to User:Bae1234568890. It is a Wikipedian's attempt at his first userpage.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 12:41, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:15, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - Editor only has 2 edits since January and they've not been on since, Seems rather pointless to move. – Davey 2010 Talk 15:09, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Assuming that low level intermittent Wikipedians have no attachment to the project ? and treating them this way is a destructive and self-fulfilling POV. Stop it.  The point of it is that userpages belong in userspace, and newcomers should be given help.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 14:34, 5 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Hahahaha what utter bollocks! - There's no pov and I'm certainly not being destructive - Userpages like this are of no value to the project and should be deleted accordingly, I would also ask you pack it in with harassing me - I'm all for discussing my !votes however every !vote so far that goes against your !vote you have to discuss it and more times than not I've explained it all in previous MFDs and it's now becoming rather silly - You disagree with me that's fine however you don't need to comment on every single !vote I make, – Davey 2010 Talk 19:33, 5 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Every contributor no matter how small is of value, and every contributor is entitled to a userpage, in proportion to their contributions.
 * Sorry, I think I replied to you overly directly. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 00:35, 6 August 2016 (UTC).  Probably even definitely.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 00:38, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Unfortunately I disagree but we'll leave it at that, Have a nice day. – Davey 2010 Talk 01:03, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks. I looked again at the page and editor's edits, I mis-remembered or mistook them being more. My apologies. Have a nice weekend yourself. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 06:16, 6 August 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete as this is entirely deletion material, no controversy at all.... SwisterTwister   talk  07:53, 7 August 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.