Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Mene 24 Karat Jewellery

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 20:06, 6 April 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Mene 24 Karat Jewellery


This has been declined multiple times and "approved" by an IP. I redirected it to GoldMoney because this operation is part of that company. The COI editors will have none of it. Bringing for deletion to cut out this waste of time. Legacypac (talk) 19:10, 29 March 2018 (UTC)


 * This argument doesn't make sense. The redirection to Goldmoney by Legacypac was incorrect as the company is not an "operation" of that company. It's a completely seperate entity with its own notoriety. Personal retribution of the judge, jury, executionary style "waste of time" and "COI editors" seems to be antithetical to the Wikipedia mission.


 * The article was well sourced and edited multiple times following commentary from editors. Legacypac's decision was simply incorrect. An IP doesn't detract from the fact that the editor is (1) a person with knowledge of the Wikipedia system (2) has a desire to contribute to the community by adding or improving articles (3) does not have any COI with the edited article by virtue of that desire. (Unsigned comment)


 * Response Really how do you know that the IP editor has no COI? Is the IP a personal friend or coworker? While we are talking about Conflict of Interest - I don't see any WP:COI disclosures around this draft at all. Am I to believe the accts involved are all volunteers who are just passionate about the company and want to expand human knowledge for no financial gain? Legacypac (talk) 16:55, 30 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete - I think I'd have tried G11, as it is blatant advertising. If the most notable "fact" about a creative design company is the amount its raised in funding, I don't think it's very Notable. KJP1 (talk) 17:04, 30 March 2018 (UTC)
 * I thought about that but given the situation decided to go for the more definitive MfD result. Legacypac (talk) 17:48, 30 March 2018 (UTC)


 * Mene Mene Tekel Upharsin
 * Delete as probable COI draft. Robert McClenon (talk) 03:13, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete: Arguments for deletion are persuasive; burn it with fire!   Ravenswing   06:48, 4 April 2018 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.