Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Mia Stegner

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: no consensus. No consensus to delete. Let the Draft: processes run their course. (non-admin closure) UnitedStatesian (talk) 12:27, 2 February 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Mia Stegner


Likely COI vanity page about a non-notable teenager Legacypac (talk) 12:41, 23 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Just reject, giving that reason, except avoiding the word "vanity". On would challenge the author on the page looking like an autobiography.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 14:13, 23 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Neutral - It will never be an article, but it doesn't need deleting yet. Rejection has been developed for things like these autobiographies so that we don't have to have a human deletion debate.  Robert McClenon (talk) 17:54, 23 January 2019 (UTC)

Hi! I understand that I am biased here and am doing my best to remain neutral. I have read Wikipedia's policies on autobiographies and conflicts of interest, and my understanding is that while it is strongly discouraged to create a page for yourself, it is not prohibited. I have not included any personal anecdotes, I removed my personal website as a source, and I have done my best to only include information that is verifiable (by means other than myself). While I am not largely notable in terms of popularity, I do feel that I have enough of an online presence to be "worthy of notice," and have had "coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." That said, I understand that others may disagree and this page may not get approved. Any edits or suggestions are of course welcome! -Mia — Preceding unsigned comment added by MiaStegner (talk • contribs) 20:32, 23 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep as unaccepted draft for now. We don't delete drafts on notability grounds. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 21:05, 23 January 2019 (UTC)

Comment: It will never be an article? The girls is only 18 and seems to be very precocious! Might be more likely that it will be an article someday, if not today. And she is following the rules by submitting the draft here rather than making an actual article in the mainspace— let's not be too quick to punish her for that. A loose noose (talk) 00:15, 24 January 2019 (UTC)


 * Comment we don't allow Wikipedia to be used for promotion - which is exactly what this is. When she does something actually notable someone else will write up this person. Legacypac (talk) 11:45, 25 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Comment It looks like a COI issue and should be discussed more at COIN but I am not supporting keeping it or deleting it just think it needs discussion at another venue as well Abote2 (talk) 23:46, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep. KUNC and Coloradan are good sources that cover her young career. They are local though, so I think it would be more helpful if she had more national coverage and some book reviews. I've tagged this for autobiography AngusWOOF  ( bark  •  sniff ) 15:48, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.