Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Michael Repoulis

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 03:04, 9 July 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Michael Repoulis


Declined AfC submission by a new editor following a similar playbook to the creator of the same title in the past (see linked AfC) Has already added the name to two lists of composers (both reverted by other users). Sources do not support notability and this is a time waster. See Articles_for_deletion/Michael_Repoulis although I can't see the deleted page, presumably this page is roughly the same content and therefore a recreation of deleted content. Legacypac (talk) 02:21, 1 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete per nomination. This article was rejected three days in a row — including today — and the submitter already resubmitted it with no new sources. This is wasting everyone's time. Player 03 (talk) 12:09, 1 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - If the author doesn't want the draft deleted, they should request to have the deleted article temporarily restored for comparison in order to demonstrate that this is not a repost of a deleted article rather than just resubmitting it. Robert McClenon (talk) 18:50, 1 July 2017 (UTC)
 * And it's been submitted and declined again with the reviewer noting "deceptive blank edits" and "wasting our time". Legacypac (talk) 22:09, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.