Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Mike "Greeny" Green

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  Keep. Author seems to be making a good faith attempt to fix the article. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 05:40, 29 November 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Mike "Greeny" Green


Nominating the article (not the redirect) for deletion. This is a draft that is making no progress toward approval after more than two months because the author doesn't heed advice. Robert McClenon (talk) 02:23, 21 November 2015 (UTC)

Aagreeny4 (talk) 22:48, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment: I have found some potential sources for establishing notability; they are listed here, at the Teahouse. I'm waiting for consensus about whether each of the sources I found meets WP:42, and also to see whether anyone has access to the offline sources already cited in the draft to determine whether they meet WP:42, so I'm reserving my !vote for now. — GrammarFascist  contribs talk 07:59, 21 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep "Draft making no progress toward approval" is not a valid reason to delete, and in this specific case there are offline sources already cited, and the possibility of more as discussed at the Teahouse, (see above) that may well establish notability. DES (talk) 15:44, 21 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Weak Delete - After reading the Teahouse discussion and the draft page I have to say that while deletion is not an optimal case for a new user's work, keeping this in limbo would not help anyone in the long run. Then there is that whole son daughter and dad conflict of interest case. Is this draft really salvageable? I am not convinced. Ceosad (talk) 18:12, 23 November 2015 (UTC) Edit: corrected her gender. Ceosad (talk) 23:13, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
 * I'm not sure if I am allowed to comment on this section. I just want to explain what I am doing now to improve the article. I have asked others and am waiting to hear about the reliability of the sources that were mentioned in the Teahouse. I will also trim down the article. I have also asked for others to contribute and help with the neutrality on the talkpage, since I am related to the subject. Please don't delete my work. Thank you all for helping and your time and input.
 * You are absolutely allowed, Aagreeny4. Cordless Larry (talk) 08:28, 25 November 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.