Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Mohammeduzzalmiah

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  delete. ✗ plicit  00:25, 19 May 2022 (UTC)

Draft:Mohammeduzzalmiah

 * – (View MfD) &#8203;

After 4 declines and 2 rejections, the creator still refuses to listen and keeps submitting this draft on a non-notable person to AfC (removing previous declines and comments while doing so, too). A block of 43.245.120.27, which was submitting it before, has only led to the same person coming back on another IP, 116.58.203.42. Tol (talk &#124; contribs) @ 23:15, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete: Per nom, and due to the poor reliability of references. Even if notable, WP:TNT would apply.  SmokeyJoe (talk) 23:25, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
 * After digging a bit, this is quite possibly G5 eligible as a sock of Mohammed Uzzal Miah (and Alex5728Aj, Johnghhhh, etc.) Tol  (talk &#124; contribs) @ 23:26, 9 May 2022 (UTC)


 * Delete and Salt to prevent further disruption from the return of blocked users. Amadeus22  🙋 🔔 02:47, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Salting in draftspace is a bad idea. It teaches them to use sneaky unmatched titles, and it makes tracking them harder. It is much easier to respond to a recreation at this title than to a new flavour of disruption elsewhere. SmokeyJoe (talk) 04:00, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Agreed, esp. as this article name isn't even how the person's actual name is rendered (per the draft, that is). -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:49, 17 May 2022 (UTC)


 *  Weak Delete - Needed rejecting, and was rejected. As long as we are here, get rid of it.  Robert McClenon (talk) 16:29, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete, but do not salt - as SmokeyJoe says, leaving the title unprotected means it becomes a ready-made honeypot should he decide to try again. —Jéské Couriano  v^&lowbar;^v  a little blue Bori 06:37, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, without salting per above comments. --DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:50, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment - There is the same person behind all of the shifting IP addresses, who uses the edit summary repeatedly:
 * The human seems to have limited English. Agree that the draft title should be left unsalted.  Robert McClenon (talk) 15:55, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete: per nom. – robertsky (talk) 17:06, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.