Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Moostoos

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  keep and move to mainspace  see Moostoos. (non-admin closure) Extraordinary Writ (talk) 20:53, 9 February 2022 (UTC)

Draft:Moostoos

 * – (View MfD) &#8203;

This draft hasn't been touched for six months and was nominated for CSD under G13. The original editor hasn't edited since April. There is no one working on this to make it meets notability. GamerPro64 04:32, 31 January 2022 (UTC)


 * Keep - It was allowably and reasonably restored by DGG on Jan. 28th for whatever reason. — Godsy (TALK CONT ) 04:42, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
 * I tried to give a reason in the edit summary, but my keyboard macro for some reason did not expand properly -- it should have said "Probably notable" We generally consider notable people that have corresponding articles in their national biography, and this one does in the Canadian National Biography. However, it needs further work, because it is much more  likely to be kept if a/there is another source, and b/ there is some additional context. The CNB entry is apparently based on articles in the Edmonton Bulletin -- I haven't checked about access. Possibly the best course might be to put in in mainspace where it is more likely to be seen, but    had previously removed it from mainspace to draft at NPP. I made the note to at least postpone the decision. (and I am a littole curious how  happened to notice this. ` DGG ( talk ) 05:26, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Notice what? GamerPro64  05:50, 31 January 2022 (UTC)


 * Mainspace it. The subject is historical and notable. It should not have been draftified. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 09:33, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Mainspace per Smokeyjoe. Multiple sources imply that the subject is notable. ☢️Plutonical☢️  ᶜᵒᵐᵐᵘⁿᶦᶜᵃᵗᶦᵒⁿˢ  12:13, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Mainspace unless there's something the draftifier knows that we don't.  as original draftifier: your edit summary only said "Not ready for mainspace".  Is there any objection you had not clarified in the edit summary?  While three references are preferred, for old, historical subjects, a single strong reference like the one given in the article  is probably enough IMO.  SnowFire (talk) 08:53, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Mainspace, as one of the references seems to demonstrate notability (third bullet in WP:ANYBIO). twsabin 20:58, 3 February 2022 (UTC)


 * Draftifying month-old articles is wrong. Draftification is for recently created stuff, not old stuff. Draftifying old stuff is a backdoor to WP:G13 deletion and is an abuse of the process since 99% of the time nobody decides to work on it. I don't know why people think this is appropriate but it should stop. Chess (talk) (please use&#32; on reply) 22:12, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.