Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Morgan Berry

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 07:53, 20 June 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Morgan Berry


This page was previously an article before it was moved to the draft namespace per Articles for deletion/Morgan Berry (2nd nomination). The draft was then deleted as G13 in October last year, and recently I have asked for it to be restored due to there being a previous AfD. I still think, however, that the draft should be deleted. This is because it consists entirely of unreliable sources, and will never be accepted. Also, the external link to on the talk page has only links to other unreliable sources, including Wikipedia. Interviews are also not reliable sources. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 23:40, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep - It's a draft, and there might be reliable sources in the future. Not doing any harm, such as not being resubmitted tendentiously.  Robert McClenon (talk) 00:42, 11 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete as a WP:TNT case. *Might* be notable, but most of the sources are unacceptable sources for building new content, and there is no prose worth keeping.  Trying to improve this draft from directory promotion based on unreliable promotional sources to encyclopedic content based on WP:THREE quality sources (the minimum standard) will be much harder than simply starting again.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 05:43, 11 June 2019 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.