Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Mubina Rattonsey

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 19:38, 23 May 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Mubina Rattonsey


This draft and another version of it, now speedy-deleted, are the work of a paid editor and sockmaster. This nomination is not based on notability, which supposedly cannot be discussed at MFD (although those who say that notability cannot be used to delete will also argue that possible notability can be used to keep), but for conduct reasons. In case anyone needs to be reminded, paid editing is restricted and sockpuppetry is forbidden. Robert McClenon (talk) 17:07, 15 May 2018 (UTC)
 * What is the evidence of paid editing or sock puppetry? Notability is relevant, but you have to use a magic word, such as “promotion”. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 12:54, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
 * The creater's disclosure on the face of the draft is a good place to start SmokeyJoe. Rejected clearly by several AfC reviewers so Delete Legacypac (talk) 10:39, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.