Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Muhammad Umar Khan (MU Khan)

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  no consensus. If the user returns from their current (temporary) block, perhaps someone could ask them if they meant this to be their userpage? RL0919 (talk) 17:30, 24 August 2021 (UTC)

Draft:Muhammad Umar Khan (MU Khan)

 * – (View MfD) &#8203;

Was tagged for U5 speedy deletion but that was declined as the page is not in userspace. Nevertheless, this page has no prospect of ever becoming an article. Stifle (talk) 09:48, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment: Username that created the draft is the same. For me G11 has a chance for the page will be deleted. If not, let it rot for six months. User:Ahthga YramTalk with me! I want to change my name! 11:08, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep - Has not been submitted. If submitted, would need rejecting.  Drafts do not need to be deleted just because they will never be articles.  Robert McClenon (talk) 02:47, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Move to User:Muhammad Umar Khan (MU Khan). I think this is an attempt of trying to create a user page in the wrong namespace. It would be acceptable as this user's page imho. Regards So  Why  17:44, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
 * , that's if the person wrote anything about topics they are interested in editing for Wikipedia. AngusW🐶🐶F  ( bark  •  sniff ) 00:17, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Actually, WP:UPYES contains no such limitations. If I want to write solely who I am and what I do, I can do so, provided I don't solely use it to promote myself or others. That's why WP:UPNO only forbids "excessive unrelated content", not all unrelated content. Regards So  Why  12:26, 29 July 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete personal information that likely violates WP:BLPPRIVACY. It's probably autobiographical, but who's to stop someone from posting any Facebook / social media user's information like that as an actual article? DOB is not referenced by the Facebook profile. If he were under 18, he'd be sent to Oversight.  AngusW🐶🐶F  ( bark  •  sniff ) 00:17, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Userfy. The content seems harmless enough but it looks more like a user page than an article. J I P  &#124; Talk 15:53, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
 * , if this is the result, recommend removing DOB. AngusW🐶🐶F  ( bark  •  sniff ) 17:08, 3 August 2021 (UTC)


 * Userfy and redact DOB, per AngusWOOF. Looks like an attempt at a user page, and the user has made a few encyclopedic edits. - Nabla (talk) 22:18, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.