Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Nabhit Kapur

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  keep. (non-admin closure) Tol &#124; Talk &#124; Contribs 01:31, 27 April 2021 (UTC)

Draft:Nabhit Kapur

 * – (View MfD) &#8203;

It fails WP:GNG (even WP:SNG), WP:SIGCOV, and WP:RS/WP:RSP. Multiple attempts are made to push this entity into main article namespace. Hence, calling for an MfD. - Hatchens (talk) 06:58, 19 April 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep: I had approved this draft a few minutes before this nomination. On the contrary, I believe the subject passes GNG based on the sources already present inside. The draft came a long way since it was first submitted, and I believe that it is ready for main-space. Mottezen (talk) 07:02, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep, I concur with Mottezen, this person looks notable and its not very promotional, though its not perfect, I would also accept this. Devonian Wombat (talk) 07:45, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep. No valid reasons to delete. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 08:50, 19 April 2021 (UTC) On review, I think the draft either meets, or is close to meeting, the WP:GNG.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 02:03, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep per WP:NMFD. May be due for a shot at the more perilous survival landscape of the mainspace per the opinations of those above. — Godsy (TALK CONT ) 17:57, 19 April 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep: I created this draft one and half month ago. You @Hatchens, deleted this draft then I read all guidelines again. Make some changes and created the draft again. Submitted for review. I created draft of Nabhit Kapur two times and that doesn't mean it doesnt follow the policies and criteria. And it also doesnt mean you have the liberty to delete it. Rajveer90 (talk) 00:58, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Hi Rajveer90. My general advice for people like you is to stop trying to write new topics until you have good experience improving existing articles.  When you have this experience, make some contributions at WP:AfD.  Then, read WP:DUD.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 01:52, 20 April 2021 (UTC)

Hello SmokeyJoe,

I do agree with this point that one should have some experience but I have been creating articles on Wikipedia from last two years. I created three or four articles till now and made some edits too. I dont know why this draft was deleted? Rajveer90 (talk) 01:55, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Rajveer90, if you don't know why, then follow my advice above. Do more edits on existing articles.  Then do some WP:AfD reviewing, and then you will learn.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 02:00, 20 April 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep per WP:NMFD. —  csc -1 01:58, 20 April 2021 (UTC)

SmokeyJoe, noted.

But I am talking about this draft. Does it really not follow the guidelines? As I have read everything before creating the draft.

Rajveer90 (talk) 02:03, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
 * If you move your userspace drafts to mainspace yourself, they may get sent to AfD. At AfD, you will get better feedback than at AfC.  I advise you to get experience as an AfD reviewer to better understand AfD.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 02:05, 20 April 2021 (UTC)

Robert McClenon (talk) 14:49, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep - Not commenting on whether this is ready for mainspace in its current state, but may be ready for mainspace in near future.
 * The statement that this has been pushed into article space repeatedly is an exaggeration. It has been declined once and draftified once.  It doesn't need deleting.
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.